I didn't read much of the criticism (legitimate and otherwise) when it first came out, other than perusing headlines, because
- I hadn't seen the movie yet
- I didn't have any immediate plans to see the movie
- I try not to critique things I haven't actually read/seen/watched/experienced.
It did strike me, even before Leslie Jones' character's entrance in the film, that why does the black woman have to be the non-scientist? If you have the opportunity to "reboot" or "do over" a film to include women and have more diversity, why go that route? On the other hand, I realize that when pitching this project, it was probably as "a Ghostbusters film for Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon, Kirsten Wiig, and Leslie Jones" rather than "a women-led Ghostbusters reboot." The difference between the two is that when a project already has a star (or stars) in mind, it's written and tailored for them; rather than a project that might have open auditions with at least one goal of having a more diverse cast.
That said, I have met, known, and interacted with many women like Jones' "Patty" in all kinds of professions, everything from public transit like Patty to academia to corporate overlords, and maybe they want the representation, too. Patty herself was one of my favorite parts of the film and had many of the best lines.
I feel like the film addressed many of its criticisms head-on directly through the script in almost meta-textual fashion, including the race/diversity issue with Jones' character. Case in point: the scene at the metal rock concert when Patty goes to crowdsurf like Abby does. The crowd does not hold her up; she falls flat on her back on the hard floor. And I winced, both at the physical impact and at the implication.
And then Patty said it for me: "Okay, I don't know if it was a race thing or a lady thing, but I'm mad as hell."
Exactly, Patty.
And there's more. When Abby tells Erin to read a specific comment on their first ghost video: "Ain't no bitches gonna hunt no ghosts." Yeah, pretty sure that could have come directly from any one of the press releases when this reboot was announced.
And, of course, when Dr. Martin Heiss shows up to the team's "office" and demands to know, in all of his white male privilege, "Why are you pretending to capture ghosts?" As if to say, "how dare you attempt to do this thing?" which is what many of the "critics" have said all along. And Abby and Erin both have the two reactions we tend to have to such a thing: to prove ourselves imprudently and to attempt to not "lower ourselves" to their level.
For me, the movie as a whole shows what we women have to put up with on a daily basis, no matter our profession: the constant questioning, how-dare-you-ing, the automatic assumption/requirement that we must prove ourselves, constantly and continually, and even then the majority of people (not just mean, though largely so) still do not believe us, give us credit, respect us in our own fields. Every. Fucking. Day. And, again, Abby and Erin display the two major reactions we women to have that continual questioning (neither of which are "right" or "wrong," they're just the most common).
So yeah, I liked it. I recognized a lot of those experiences -- minus the paranormal part. Well, mostly minus the paranormal stuff, but that's a different story.
Other things I liked (in usual Leonard bullet point style):
- The cameos! So much fun, even the building cameos and ghost cameos. By the way, where was Rick Moranis?
- And how the O.G. firehouse is super expensive rather than looking like a "de-militarized" zone.
- How many different ways can we not say "Ghostbusters"? I really enjoyed the little wink and nudge at the original movie(s) without actually saying it: from the bits with the logo, to the theme music, to managing to say "who you gonna call?" out of context. That was cheeky and fun.
- Really LOL'd at "Ghost Jumpers" TV show -- mostly because my Unit and I refer to one of our favorite ghost shows (that we used to watch all the time) as "Ghost Humpers."
- In fact, lots of different "points" to the original movie without being too on the nose; example: if they had gotten the firehouse building right off the bat, that would have been too much. If they had also said some of the favorite, quotable lines from the first movie (in similar contexts), it wouldn't have worked.
- I liked the fact that 1) it was not an attempt to recreate a shot-for-shot O.G. movie, simply putting in women instead of men as the lead roles. This is its own film and should be enjoyed as such.
- I especially appreciated the fact that not one of the female characters was attempting to be "the girl version" of Murray's, Aykroyd's, Ramis', and/or Hudson's characters. Sure, there were nods to them: Holtzmann's crazy hair is reminiscent not necessarily of Harold Ramis' Egon, but the Egon in the cartoon (remember that thing?), and yeah, both Patty and Zeddmore are black and non-scientists. But that's kind of where it ends, and I like that. These women are their own characters and not stuck to the molds the O.G. guys created.
Little Leonard watched this every Saturday morning. |
- Chris Hemsworth a.k.a "Kevin" -- that was fun. And weird and dorky and fun.
- Speaking of weird, some bits with Kevin show that certain type of humor that occasionally devolves into absurdist (you can see it in The Unbreakable Kimmie Schmidt as well, especially the first few episodes of Season 2). There is no "why" or "reason" for many of his quirks (like the eyeglass thing!). They simply are and there is no other tie-in to the joke or punchline; it simply is. Thankfully in this script, they did not get too heavy-handed with that type of humor (I don't usually care for it).
I don't think I had the same visceral reactions many other women had to watching this movie, similar to some of the visceral reactions many women had seeing Wonder Woman on the big screen as well: those reactions that brings tears to one's eyes seeing a dream made real. But I think that has less to do with either film (I didn't have that reaction to WW myself) and more to do with the fact that Leonard is dead inside. I also think my reactions go the route of being able to see something and enjoy it and not have the immediate reaction of "Where are all the women?" or "Why is this all straight white dudes?" It's more an absence of my reaction/frustration with the patriarchy than a reaction to seeing women on screen. And that's still a good thing. (Plus also, dead inside.)
Quotable Quotes: One of the things many of us enjoy about the first two Ghostbusters films are the things we can quote for them. So I tried to think of what quotes stuck with me from this movie -- unfortunately, not too many right off the bat, but perhaps more will make themselves apparent on subsequent viewings. In the meantime:
Quotable Quotes: One of the things many of us enjoy about the first two Ghostbusters films are the things we can quote for them. So I tried to think of what quotes stuck with me from this movie -- unfortunately, not too many right off the bat, but perhaps more will make themselves apparent on subsequent viewings. In the meantime:
- The power of Patty compels you!
- Too sexy for academia?
- Room full of nightmares right there.
- Ma'am, can you tell us where you got the world's tiniest bow tie?
In conclusion...
I also want to dress like Holtzmann, particularly the leather jacket, the little leather fingerless gloves, the smoking jacket, and the lady-suit complete with vest. And I'm fairly certain given enough time and hairspray, I can get my hair to look like that. Just not blonde. Leonard does not make a good blonde.
Tangent: I find it interesting that they approximated the look of an undercut without actually cutting/shaving her hair, which she probably didn't want to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment